<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duplicity &#8211; Backup to the Cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ginkel.com/2010/03/duplicity-backup-to-the-cloud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ginkel.com/2010/03/duplicity-backup-to-the-cloud/</link>
	<description>A Geek&#039;s Thoughts on Life, Arts, Software and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thilo-Alexander Ginkel</title>
		<link>http://blog.ginkel.com/2010/03/duplicity-backup-to-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-609</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilo-Alexander Ginkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ginkel.com/?p=567#comment-609</guid>
		<description>Not offering any Linux support is certainly one aspect, but what I think is even more important is that those &quot;unlimited bandwidth, unlimited storage&quot; offerings typically do not have a sensible business model backing their operation and tend to fail rather quickly once their venture capital has been used up. Not exactly what I need for a disaster recovery solution. ;-)

Nevertheless, Backblaze&#039;s architecture is still impressive and apparently quite cost-efficient: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.backblaze.com/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.backblaze.com/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not offering any Linux support is certainly one aspect, but what I think is even more important is that those &#8220;unlimited bandwidth, unlimited storage&#8221; offerings typically do not have a sensible business model backing their operation and tend to fail rather quickly once their venture capital has been used up. Not exactly what I need for a disaster recovery solution. <img src='http://blog.ginkel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Nevertheless, Backblaze&#8217;s architecture is still impressive and apparently quite cost-efficient: <a href="http://www.backblaze.com/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.backblaze.com/petabytes-on-a-budget-how-to-build-cheap-cloud-storage.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ginkel.com/2010/03/duplicity-backup-to-the-cloud/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ginkel.com/?p=567#comment-608</guid>
		<description>backblaze macht&#039;s ähnlich, aber da du weder windows noch mac os nutzt, wohl keine alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>backblaze macht&#8217;s ähnlich, aber da du weder windows noch mac os nutzt, wohl keine alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

